Socialist Professor’s Trump Truth Goes Viral

A growing sense of frustration appears to be taking hold among some of the left’s most committed ideological voices, and one recent social media post captured that mood in unusually blunt terms.

Dan Kervick, an assistant professor of philosophy at Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire who describes himself as a “socialist internationalist,” offered a bleak assessment of both global politics and the American left in a post on X.

“We’ve lost Venezuela. We might lose Cuba. The condition of Palestine is desperate. Global climate action is dead. Technofascists are running everything. The US ‘left’ is Magafied populist trash in possession of zero brain power.”

The first half of Kervick’s statement focused on international causes and political movements he views as setbacks. The second half, however, was directed squarely at his own side.

His criticism raises an interesting question: Why would a self-described socialist accuse the American left of becoming “Magafied”?

He was not suggesting that Democrats or left-wing activists have embraced Donald Trump’s policies. Rather, he appeared to be arguing that they have increasingly adopted the tactics, style, and political instincts that helped make Trump successful.


Over the last several years, many Democratic politicians and activists have attempted to mirror Trump’s approach to public engagement. Social media has become a battleground of memes, viral clips, nicknames, and rapid-fire exchanges. Rather than presenting a distinct political identity, some critics argue that Democrats have spent much of their energy trying to create a left-wing version of Trump-style politics.

That strategy carries risks.

Political movements often succeed when they offer a clear vision of their own. Movements built primarily in opposition to a single figure can struggle once that figure changes course, leaves office, or simply dominates the conversation in ways that force everyone else to react.

For Democrats, that challenge may become increasingly important as future elections approach. Voters eventually want to know not only what a party opposes, but what it intends to build.


Meanwhile, the Trump administration continues to emphasize a message centered on national pride, confidence, and celebration of American identity. Supporters point to events such as the recent UFC Freedom 250 gathering at the White House as examples of that approach. The event was presented less as a policy discussion and more as a cultural celebration, drawing enthusiastic reactions from attendees.