Every once in a while, the mask slips, and in the case of Hillary Clinton, it’s truly a terrifying sight. Recently, Clinton sat down with Rachel Maddow on MSNBC—a platform as friendly to Democrats as a puppy in a bow tie—and let her true authoritarian side peek out. The topic of conversation? What she thinks Kamala Harris’s Justice Department should do to Americans who dare to engage in “propaganda.” Spoiler alert: it’s code for anyone sharing information the Democrats don’t want you to hear. In other words, you, me, and pretty much anyone who tells the truth these days.
🚨The party that pushes out the most propaganda daily wants to police your freedom of speech!
Hillary Clinton wants to have Americans arrested civilly or criminally for ‘propaganda.’
“There needs to be deterrence.”
And she says Trump will be a dictator on day one? 🤣 pic.twitter.com/0hGbWhOV5F
— LionHearted (@LionHearted76) September 17, 2024
Maddow, ever the reliable stenographer for the Democratic machine, eagerly waded back into the tired waters of the Russia collusion narrative. Apparently, it’s 2016 all over again. According to these two, Vladimir Putin is already hard at work trying to interfere in the 2024 election because what’s a Democrat campaign without the classic Russian boogeyman?
Clinton, of course, took the bait. “I think it’s important to indict the Russians,” she said as if Mueller’s endless indictments of foreign nationals who will never step foot in a U.S. courtroom did anything but waste taxpayer dollars. Then, she took it a step further. There are Americans, she warned ominously, who are “engaged in this kind of propaganda.” The solution? Maybe some criminal charges. You know, just your average casual chat about locking people up for free speech. It’s hard to believe she didn’t just come out and say, “Lock them up,” but that would’ve been a bit on the nose, right?
And this, my friends, is rich coming from the queen of misinformation herself. Clinton has been peddling her own brand of election-denial propaganda ever since she lost to Donald Trump in 2016. You remember that, don’t you? The years-long Russian collusion hoax she and her cronies pushed down America’s throat? The one that was based on the now-debunked Steele dossier, which her campaign conveniently forgot to mention they paid for. The Federal Election Commission didn’t forget, though, and the Clinton campaign got slapped with a hefty fine for hiding those payments. But sure, Hillary, tell us more about how other people should be prosecuted for spreading lies.
In case we need a refresher, Hillary spent years claiming the Russians stole the election from her. “I was the candidate they basically stole an election from,” she said. However, in 2018, the DOJ admitted there was no evidence that Russia’s interference affected the outcome of the election. But, of course, none of that matters. The Democrats love to accuse everyone else of undermining democracy while conveniently forgetting their own rich history of election denial.
Hillary: “We had lots of policy [in 2016]. At the end of the day, that’s not what caused people to vote for me or against me, & I think the Harris campaign knows that … But at the end of the day, this is a contest between freedom & oppression, between democracy & autocracy.” pic.twitter.com/PamVtaQgjq
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 19, 2024
Take Al Gore, who tried to litigate his way into the White House after the 2000 election. Or the 31 Democrats who voted to reject Ohio’s electoral votes when George W. Bush defeated John Kerry in 2004. And let’s not forget Jimmy Carter claiming Trump “didn’t actually win” in 2016. In fact, it was Democrats who objected to the results of the 2016 election 11 separate times during the certification process. But we’re supposed to pretend that never happened, right?
In truth, the first “insurrection” wasn’t in 2021—it was in 2016 when Democrats repeatedly tried to overturn the will of the people. Funny how no one brings that up during their January 6 obsession.
Hillary: “We had lots of policy [in 2016]. At the end of the day, that’s not what caused people to vote for me or against me, & I think the Harris campaign knows that … But at the end of the day, this is a contest between freedom & oppression, between democracy & autocracy.” pic.twitter.com/PamVtaQgjq
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 19, 2024
And in a hilarious twist, after Hillary’s MSNBC propaganda tour, she sat down with Joe Scarborough for what can only be described as a lovefest. Joe kicked off with, “My conservative friends don’t understand why I’ve always loved you so much.” No kidding, Joe—we don’t understand it either. Then, after fawning over Hillary’s ageless beauty and energy, Mika Brzezinski piped up with the hard-hitting question: “When you were young, did you ever imagine you’d grow up to be so famous and important?”
MSNBC’s @JoeNBC first two questions to Hillary Clinton:
— My conservative friends don’t understand why I have lways loved you so much [admittedly not a question but it took him several minutes]
— You are aging beautifully and have so much energy … what is your secret?… pic.twitter.com/qdQDMIIxRc
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 19, 2024
Honestly, you can’t make this stuff up. Maybe Hillary’s ready to lock up all of us who disagree with her, but if criminal charges for misinformation are on the table, she might want to start packing her bags for a cell of her own.
🚨Yikes. A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote to make Hillary Clinton the Defense Secretary or Secretary of State:
CBS: “If there is a Harris-Walz Administration — would you want to play a part in it?”
Hillary Clinton: “I would do anything I was asked to be helpful.” pic.twitter.com/CGNNrUB0c9
— Steve Cortes (@CortesSteve) September 19, 2024
Yikes…we don’t need that.