Response Comes Following Biden Announcement

By
Gregory McMullen
-

The revelation of former President Joe Biden’s aggressive prostate cancer diagnosis has triggered not only widespread concern but also a growing chorus of medical skepticism—and outright political suspicion. With a Gleason score of 9 and bone metastasis, Biden’s illness is as severe as it gets. But what’s drawing even more attention than the diagnosis itself is the timeline, or more specifically, how this wasn’t caught sooner.

Multiple medical experts have now gone public, essentially saying the same thing: this type of cancer doesn’t just sneak up overnight.

  • Dr. Howard Forman called it “inconceivable” that this diagnosis was a sudden discovery, stating plainly that elevated PSA levels—a basic blood test for prostate cancer screening—should have shown warning signs long before now.

  • Dr. Steven Quay laid out the biological clock: even the most aggressive prostate cancers typically take 5 to 7 years to metastasize. For Biden to be diagnosed with bone metastasis now suggests he was likely carrying cancer throughout much, if not all, of his presidency.

  • Dr. David Shusterman was blunt: this sort of late-stage surprise is something he expects in veterans with no routine care, not in someone with “the best possible care in the country.”

  • Even Fox News medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel admitted he was “taken aback,” saying it’s puzzling that Biden’s condition could have advanced this far under elite medical surveillance.

These aren’t partisan voices. They’re experts speaking plainly—and they’re sounding alarms not just about the health diagnosis, but about the credibility of Biden’s medical narrative.

Enter Donald Trump Jr., who turned up the heat on social media by echoing what many Americans are now wondering:

“How did Dr. Jill Biden miss stage five metastatic cancer or is this yet another cover-up???”

Sure, his jab at Jill Biden’s academic title was theatrical, but the core question is legitimate: how could a man with round-the-clock medical monitoring, including multiple physicals while president, only now be diagnosed with a disease that experts say takes years to reach this level?

There’s no “stage five” in medical terms, but the spirit of the critique lands—especially given what we already know about efforts by Biden’s inner circle to suppress news of his cognitive decline, as documented in media investigations and the new book Original Sin.

This isn’t the first time the public has been kept in the dark about Biden’s health.

  • Reports surfaced of digital editing to disguise his frailty.

  • Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report—which detailed Biden’s memory lapses—was leaked selectively to friendly press.

  • There were documented efforts to kill media stories probing Biden’s mental fitness.

  • And now, a cancer diagnosis that almost certainly predates his final year in office is only revealed after he leaves public service?

It paints a chilling picture of a White House that prioritized optics over transparency, and a media apparatus that, in many cases, played along.

The American people were repeatedly told that Biden was “fit and vigorous,” that his occasional stumbles or blank stares were just blips. But between the cognitive lapses, deceptively edited videos, and now this shock cancer diagnosis, the evidence suggests a presidency propped up by concealment, not capability.

Even if we set politics aside, the core issue is one of honesty. Americans have a right to know whether their leaders are healthy enough to perform their duties—especially when those leaders are making decisions on nuclear policy, international war, and the economy. Instead, we were told to ignore what we saw with our own eyes.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR