Meta and TikTok activated special crisis protocols following last month’s extraordinary migrant surge into the Spanish territory of Ceuta, with European Union officials saying the companies have agreed to closer real-time coordination aimed at limiting false information surrounding future mass border crossings.
The agreement follows an incident in which more than 72,000 migrants reportedly crossed from Morocco into Ceuta within a single day, overwhelming the border and generating a flood of videos, claims and accusations on social media.
Footage showed large numbers of people, many of them young men, crossing into the Spanish enclave. The scenes quickly triggered a political argument over how the border had been overwhelmed and who was responsible.
Some critics blamed Spain’s Socialist government under Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and broader EU migration policies. Others pointed toward Morocco or people-smuggling networks.
European officials, meanwhile, have focused partly on information circulated online immediately before the crossing.
According to the European Commission, social media posts spread claims that “the Ceuta border is open,” potentially encouraging additional people to attempt the journey.
Following discussions involving the Commission, Europol, Meta and TikTok, officials established an ad hoc system intended to allow rapid communication among the platforms, European authorities and local fact-checking organizations during similar crises.
WEF: EU Chief Von Der Leyen Demands Censorship of ‘Industrial Scale Disinformation’ at Davoshttps://t.co/gOgXjTfVeq
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) January 17, 2024
Commission spokesman Balazs Ujvari said both platforms had already activated their own crisis procedures during the Ceuta incident.
“The platforms confirmed that they activated their crisis protocols and… it was decided that an ad hoc escalation and cooperation mechanism would be put in place,” Ujvari said, according to Le Monde.
The arrangement can operate within the framework of the European Union’s Digital Services Act, or DSA.
According to EU officials, the mechanism is intended to provide platforms with “better information from fact-checkers” while giving authorities a way to rapidly flag what Brussels considers harmful disinformation, including claims connected with a possible new mass border crossing.
“For now, we think that this is an effective tool,” Ujvari said. “But of course, if needed, we are ready to go further.”
That final point matters because the EU’s relationship with American social media companies is backed by considerable regulatory power.
The Digital Services Act imposes extensive obligations on the largest online platforms operating in Europe. Companies found to have violated the law can face penalties reaching 6 percent of their annual worldwide turnover.
That creates an unavoidable question about what “voluntary” cooperation means when the regulator requesting that cooperation also possesses the power to impose enormous fines.
The EU maintains that the DSA is intended to make online platforms safer and more accountable, with requirements addressing illegal content, systemic risks and transparency. Critics have repeatedly warned that government involvement in determining which information should be suppressed can create serious free-expression concerns.
Elon Musk’s X has been one of the most prominent companies to clash with European regulators.
The platform previously received a €120 million penalty under the DSA. European authorities said the violations involved transparency obligations and deceptive design practices, including issues involving X’s blue-check verification system. Musk and other critics have portrayed European regulation more broadly as an attempt to pressure platforms into restricting lawful speech.
Meta, by contrast, said its actions during the Ceuta crisis included enforcing existing rules against human smuggling.
EU Censorship Tsar Says Social Media Sites Face Ban if They Don’t Remove ‘Calls for Revolt’, Footage of Riotshttps://t.co/tj9PM9wVlt
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) July 11, 2023
A company spokesman said Meta assigned employees to monitor events in Ceuta in real time and remove material violating company policies, “including content that offers to provide, facilitate or seek human smuggling services.”
That category is notably different from political commentary about immigration or criticism of European border policy. Removing advertisements for smuggling services involves conduct prohibited by platform rules, while labeling or restricting alleged “disinformation” can require judgments about the accuracy and context of rapidly developing events.
The distinction becomes particularly important during a border crisis, when accurate information may be incomplete and rumors can spread before authorities have established what happened.
The sheer scale of the Ceuta crossing ensured that social media would become part of the story. Tens of thousands of people reaching a border in a matter of hours naturally generated videos, eyewitness accounts, political commentary and unverified claims simultaneously.
Brussels’ answer is closer coordination between authorities, fact-checkers and major technology platforms.
Meta and TikTok have agreed to participate, at least for now.
